Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Stat. 2009 Feb;37(1):427. doi: 10.1214/07-AOS561

Table 5.

Empirical power of profile least square ratio test Tn and the Wald test Wn at level 0.05 for hypothesis (4.5). Data were generated from models (4.1) with β = (0.2, c − 1.2, 1)T and c ∈ {0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.5, 0.7, 1} and α1(u) and α2(u) given by (4.2) and (4.4), respectively. The methods used are “Asm” for the asymptotic version, and “Boot” for the bootstrap version.

Tn
Wald
c B P N B P N
0 Aym 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.050 0.050 0.080
Boot 0.050 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060
0.10 Aym 0.150 0.140 0.150 0.130 0.130 0.150
Boot 0.130 0.100 0.080 0.130 0.120 0.080
0.20 Aym 0.190 0.220 0.120 0.150 0.150 0.120
Boot 0.170 0.160 0.080 0.190 0.180 0.080
0.25 Aym 0.350 0.340 0.240 0.320 0.310 0.240
Boot 0.290 0.280 0.180 0.310 0.300 0.180
0.50 Aym 0.740 0.710 0.530 0.670 0.660 0.530
Boot 0.700 0.630 0.500 0.720 0.630 0.500
0.70 Aym 0.940 0.940 0.870 0.930 0.920 0.870
Boot 0.920 0.890 0.800 0.930 0.890 0.800
1.00 Aym 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.990 0.990 1.000
Boot 0.990 0.990 0.960 0.990 0.990 0.960