Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Dec 31;130(52):17801–17811. doi: 10.1021/ja8054035

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Calorimetric titration of variant #1 (W93F/Y34W) with Fe2+ under anaerobic conditions. Plot of integrated heat versus Fe2+/variant #1 ratio. Inset: Raw data. The red line is the result of curve fitting to two independent classes of binding sites with n1 = 12.0 ± 0.7, K1 = (3.9 ± 2.2) × 106 M-1 and ΔH1° = -0.45 ± 0.17 kJ/mol, corresponding to ΔG1° = -37.6 ± 1.5 kJ/mol and ΔS1° = 125 ± 5 J K-1mol-1, and n2 = 6.8 ± 1.90, K2= (1.5 ± 0.5) × 105 M-1 and ΔH2° = 14.0 ± 7.3 kJ/mol, corresponding to ΔG2°= -29.5 ± 0.8 kJ/mol and ΔS2° = 146 ± 25 J/K-mol. Conditions: 3 μM protein in 0.1 M Mops and 2 mM Na2S2O4, pH 7.05. The Fe2+ solution was prepared in anaerobic 0.1 M Mops, 2 mM Na2S2O4, pH 7.05. Na2S2O4 helps to maintain an oxygen-free solution during the titration. Its presence does not affect Fe2+ binding to the protein.24