Table 7.
Logistic models explaining poor SRH by the total sample and the sub-samples of the poor and non-poor (odds ratio, 95%CI)
| Dependent variables | Poor SRH (total sample) | Poor SRH (poor) | Poor SRH (non-poor) | |||
| Model 1A | Model 1B | Model 2A | Model 2B | Model 3A | Model 3B | |
| Independent variables | ||||||
| Constant | 0.08** | 0.05** | 0.05** | 0.48 | 0.27 | 3.2 |
| Gender (ref: male) | 1.21 (0.92–1.59) |
1.25 (0.95–1.66) |
1.12 (0.78–1.60) |
1.14 (0.79–1.64) |
1.71 * (1.06–2.75) |
1.70 * (1.05–2.75) |
|
Age, years (ref:15–44) |
||||||
| 45–64 | 1.18 (0.85–1.63) |
1.39 * (1.00–1.94) |
2.05 ** (1.37–3.07) |
2.02 ** (1.34–3.04) |
0.52 * (0.28–0.98) |
0.57 (0.30–1.07) |
| 65- | 0.90 (0.60–1.35) |
1.19 (0.78–1.80) |
1.30 (0.74–2.25) |
1.34 (0.76–2.34) |
0.62 (0.30–1.25) |
0.67 (0.33–1.39) |
| Ethnicity (ref: Han) | ||||||
| Hui | 1.30 (0.92–1.84) |
1.22 (0.85–1.73) |
1.23 (0.80–1.90) |
1.11 (0.71–1.74) |
1.02 (0.53–1.98) |
0.99 (0.51–1.92) |
| Others | 0.50 (0.17–1.52) |
0.51 (0.17–1.56) |
0.79 (0.20–3.22) |
0.67 (0.16–2.88) |
0.11 (0.01–1.17) |
0.13 (0.01–1.36) |
| Education level (ref: illiterate) | ||||||
| Primary school | 0.62 * (0.42–0.93) |
0.67 (0.45–1.01) |
0.86 (0.53–1.41) |
0.91 (0.55–1.51) |
0.31 ** (0.14–0.67) |
0.32 ** (0.15–0.70) |
| Middle school | 0.50 ** (0.34–0.75) |
0.57 ** (0.38–0.87) |
0.69 (0.41–1.15) |
0.74 (0.44–1.25) |
0.34 ** (0.16–0.72) |
0.35 ** (0.17–0.75) |
| High school | 0.46 ** (0.29–0.74) |
0.57 * (0.35–0.92) |
0.94 (0.50–1.76) |
0.98 (0.51–1.85) |
0.21 ** (0.09–0.49) |
0.21 ** (0.09–0.50) |
| Technical secondary school | 0.22 ** (0.10–0.49) |
0.27 ** (0.12–0.59) |
0.36 (0.12–1.07) |
0.40 (0.13–1.21) |
0.12 ** (0.03–0.42) |
0.13 ** (0.04–0.48) |
| Junior college and above | 0.29 ** (0.14–0.61) |
0.38 * (0.18–0.82) |
0.59 (0.19–1.90) |
0.72 (0.22–2.32) |
0.22 ** (0.07–0.69) |
0.27 * (0.09–0.87) |
| Marriage status (ref: never married) | ||||||
| First married | 1.13 (0.60–2.13) |
1.27 (0.68–2.40) |
1.77 (0.83–3.80) |
2.01 (0.92–4.39) |
0.55 (0.16–1.94) |
0.54 (0.15–1.93) |
| Remarried | 0.82 (0.28–2.43) |
0.90 (0.30–2.67) |
2.05 (0.57–7.37) |
2.12 (0.58–7.81) |
0.07 * (0.01–0.82) |
0.09 (0.01–1.09) |
| Divorced | 1.72 (0.76–3.90) |
1.62 (0.72–3.66) |
2.23 (0.88–5.69) |
2.27 (0.87–5.87) |
0.68 (0.09–4.82) |
0.55 (0.08–3.94) |
| Widowed | 1.61 (0.79–3.29) |
1.45 (0.71–2.96) |
2.54 * (1.07–6.02) |
2.38 (0.99–5.71) |
0.57 (0.13–2.40) |
0.43 (0.10–1.90) |
| Residence district (ref: Chengxi) | ||||||
| Chengbei | 0.65 (0.40–1.07) |
0.63 (0.38–1.05) |
0.76 (0.39–1.49) |
0.91 (0.46–1.80) |
0.43 * (0.20–0.96) |
0.47 (0.21–1.03) |
| Chengdong | 1.22 (0.72–2.05) |
1.17 (0.69–1.99) |
1.79 (0.92–3.52) |
2.01* (1.01–4.01) |
0.53 (0.21–1.35) |
0.59 (0.23–1.51) |
| Chengzhong | 0.50** (0.30–0.84) |
0.47 ** (0.28–0.80) |
0.71 (0.36–1.41) |
0.74 (0.37–1.46) |
0.21 ** (0.09–0.52) |
0.22 ** (0.09–0.53) |
| Jinfeng | 0.75 (0.46–1.23) |
0.65 (0.39–1.08) |
1.11 (0.58–2.11) |
1.27 (0.65–2.47) |
0.25 ** (0.10–0.61) |
0.28 ** (0.11–0.69) |
| Xixia | 0.91 (0.55–1.51) |
0.80 (0.48–1.34) |
1.13 (0.58–2.21) |
1.30 (0.65–2.58) |
0.40 * (0.17–0.93) |
0.43 (0.18–1.02) |
| Xingqing | 0.85 (0.55–1.31) |
0.80 (0.51–1.24) |
1.09 (0.61–1.97) |
1.16 (0.64–2.10) |
0.41 * (0.20–0.86) |
0.45 * (0.22–0.95) |
| Economic status (ref: non-poverty) | - | 2.17 ** (1.64–2.88) |
- | - | - | - |
| Log (family monthly income) | - | - | - | 0.39** (0.20–0.74) |
- | 0.43 (0.19–1.02) |
| Chronic illness (ref: no chronic illness) | 12.49** (9.49–16.44) |
11.84** (8.98–15.60) |
9.07** (6.45–12.75) |
9.35** (6.61–13.22) |
28.57** (16.36–49.89) |
27.80** (15.90–48.63) |
| Neighbourhood cohesion (ref: high level) | 1.45** (1.12–1.88) |
1.40* (1.08–1.82) |
1.42* (1.01–1.98) |
1.40 (1.00–1.98) |
1.26 (0.81–1.98) |
1.23 (0.78–1.93) |
| Social participation (ref: high level) | 0.85 (0.64–1.15) |
0.78 (0.58–1.06) |
0.69 (0.46–1.04) |
0.69 (0.46–1.05) |
0.97 (0.60–1.56) |
0.89 (0.55–1.45) |
| Reciprocity and social support (ref: high level) | 1.36* (1.05–1.76) |
1.34* (1.03–1.74) |
1.30 (0.93–1.81) |
1.31 (0.94–1.83) |
1.35 (0.86–2.12) |
1.29 (0.82–2.03) |
| Interpersonal relationship network (ref: high level) | 1.16 (0.88–1.53) |
1.04 (0.78–1.39) |
1.22 (0.84–1.78) |
1.16 (0.79–1.70) |
0.67 (0.42–1.09) |
0.66 (0.41–1.07) |
| Perception of trust and safety (ref: high level) | 1.00 (0.78–1.30) |
0.98 (0.75–1.26) |
0.91 (0.65–1.26) |
0.90 (0.64–1.26) |
1.00 (0.63–1.57) |
1.00 (0.63–1.58) |
| N | 1919 | 1919 | 976 | 957 | 943 | 939 |
| χ2 (df) | 606.24(26) | 636.13(27) | 308.41(26) | 312.23(27) | 292.86(26) | 293.36(27) |
| -2 log likelihood | 1595.37 | 1565.48 | 958.35 | 930.72 | 553.13 | 547.95 |
| Percentage correct of predicted values | 79.4 | 80.5 | 75.7 | 76.2 | 86.2 | 86.4 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Model 1A was based on the total sample. Model 1B introduced economic status (poor or non-poor). Model 2A and 3A were based on two sub-samples: the poor and the non-poor, using the same variables as model 1A. Model 2B and 3B introduced an income variable (log (family monthly income)).