Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Feb;117(1):1–15. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.1

Table 1.

Predicted Affective Startle Modulation Patterns in the Nondepressed Group, Planned Interaction Tests, and Predicted Group Effects for Each Probe Condition

Probe condition Predicted startle patterns in the nondepressed group Planned trend test Predictions
2,000-ms anticipatorya graphic file with name nihms94815t1.jpg Group × Quadratic Trend Significant group interaction; significant quadratic trend in the nondepressed group only
750-ms anticipatoryb (exploratory) graphic file with name nihms94815t2.jpg Group × Linear Trend Significant group interaction; significant linear trend in the nondepressed group only
300-ms viewingc graphic file with name nihms94815t3.jpg Group × Quadratic Trend No group interaction; significant quadratic trends in both groups
3,500–4,500-ms viewingd graphic file with name nihms94815t4.jpg Group × Linear Trend Significant group interaction; significant linear trend in the nondepressed group only

Note. Bar graphs are idealized and meant for illustrative purposes; they do not reflect possible amplitude differences between probe categories. Consistent with an emotion-context insensitivity model of depression (Rottenberg, 2005, 2007), patterns of startle responding in the depressed group were predicted to be attenuated, relative to the nondepressed control group, across the three levels of the valence factor in all probe conditions.