Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;7(2):112–120. doi: 10.1370/afm.958

Table 6.

Odds of Patient Anxiety After the Consultation in the Multivariate, Multilevel Logistic Regression Analysis

Variable Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Group
    Immediate test ordering 1.00 (ref)
    Watchful waiting 2.25 (1.09–4.60)
    Watchful waiting + QI 1.12 (0.64–1.97)
Patient had anxiety before the consultation
    Yes 6.83 (4.15–11.25)
    No 1.00 (ref)
Patient expected referral to a specialist
    Yes 2.64 (1.52–4.57)
    No or did not care 1.00 (ref)
Physician felt certain that there was no cause for alarm
    Yes 2.37 (1.02–5.51)
    No 1.00 (ref)
Physician took a special interest in psychiatry, psychosomatics, or unexplained complaints
    Yes 2.21 (1.13–4.31)
    No 1.00 (ref)
Physician performed physical examination
    Yes 2.03 (1.11–3.72)
    No 1.00 (ref)
Patient expected blood tests to be ordered
    Yes 1.84 (1.07–3.20)
    No or unknown 1.00 (ref)
Patient considered complaints bearable
    Yes 0.56 (0.32–0.97)
    No 1.00 (ref)
Patient was satisfied with the consultation
    Yes 0.53 (0.32–0.88)
    No 1.00 (ref)
Patient knew seriousness of complaints after the consultation, according to patient
    Yes 0.45 (0.25–0.79)
    No 1.00 (ref)

CI=confidence interval; ref = reference group; QI = quality improvement.

Notes: Detailed definitions for each category are given in the supplemental tables. Group was retained in the model using 2 dummy variables. The intra-cluster correlation coefficient was 2.53 e−7.