Table 1.
CONS | PROS | Application examples | |
---|---|---|---|
NASBA | Needs the bacteria to be viable | Cheap | Detection of enterotoxin related genes from Bacillus sp. in milk [18] |
Needs the gene to be expressed RNA handling might be troublesome |
Sensitive | ||
TaqMan | Cost effective for a limited number of DNA species | Easy to use | Detection of Salmonella sp. in ground meat [14] |
The number of simultaneous DNA species detectable is limited by the fluorophores SNP detection not always reliable |
Quick result | ||
High density microarrays | Expensive | Detects the highest number of DNA species simultaneously | Assessment of E. Coli pathotype [44] |
Slower than NASBA and TaqMan PCR | |||
LDR-UA | Slower than NASBA and TaqMan PCR | Highest performance in SNP detection | Detection of GMO contamination in food and cyanobacteria in water [4, 6] |
Highly sensitive | |||
Very flexible |