Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 1;26(25):4063–4071. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4501

Table 1.

Distribution of Patient Characteristics in Sample Compared With Not-in-Sample Cohort

Factor In Sample (n = 465)
Not in Sample (n = 1,503)
% SE % SE
Chemotherapy
    AT arm 50.1 1.1 50.2 1.1
    AC arm 49.9 1.1 49.8 1.1
Age, years
    ≤ 45 23.7 2.0 27.1 1.2
    46-65 63.7 2.3 63.0 1.3
    > 65 12.7 1.6 9.9 0.8
Menopausal status
    Premenopausal 41.4 2.4 47.6 1.3
    Postmenopausal 58.6 2.4 52.4 1.3
Tumor size, cm
    ≤ 2.0 53.9 2.4 57.5 1.3
    2.1-5.0 42.5 2.4 39.3 1.3
    > 5.0 3.6 0.9 3.2 0.5
Axillary nodes
    Negative 56.5 1.1 58.1 1.1
    One positive 24.0 1.6 26.1 1.1
    Two positive 13.5 1.4 10.5 0.8
    Three positive 6.1 1.0 5.3 0.6
Local tumor grade
    Low 12.3 1.6 14.4 0.9
    Intermediate 48.6 2.4 48.8 1.3
    High 33.2 2.2 29.7 1.2
    Unknown 5.9 1.2 7.1 0.7
Central tumor grade
    Low 22.6 2.1 NA
    Intermediate 47.5 2.4 NA
    High 29.9 2.2 NA
Local HER2/neu*
    Positive 21.9 2.0 23.4 1.1
    Negative 44.0 2.4 45.1 1.3
    Unknown 34.1 2.3 31.5 1.2
Recurrence and survival
    5-year RFI 90.0 0.7 91.1 0.7
    5-year OS 92.3 1.1 94.3 0.6
    Median follow-up, years 6.3 6.3

NOTE. The not-in-sample cohort included all patients with hormone receptor–positive disease (determined locally) not included in this analysis. There were no significant differences in the characteristics of sample patients included in this analysis compared with the not-in-sample group with hormone receptor–positive disease, with the exception of estimated menopause distributions (P = .03) and the proportion with two to three nodes positive (P = .05).

Abbreviations: AT, doxorubicin plus docetaxel; AC, doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide; RFI, relapse-free interval; OS, overall survival; NA, not applicable (patients not in sample did not have tumor grade centrally reviewed).

*

Local HER2 positive included IHC 2+.