Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2008 Aug;11(7):545–559. doi: 10.2174/138620708785204045

Table 3.

Summary the retrospective analysis of the qHTS

9.2 uM Threshold TP FP FN TN
Class 1–2 3 σ 50 129 7 9,735
6 σ 38 31 19 9,833
Class 1–3 3 σ 76 103 NA 9,668
6 σ 45 24 NA 9,747
1.8 uM Threshold TP FP FN TN
Class 1–2 3 σ 40 131 NA 9,733
6 σ 31 27 NA 9,837

TP, true positive; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; TN, true negative. NA, not applicable. Class 3 CR curves are relevant for this analysis when the 1.8 uM or 9 uM was the highest tested concentration as these curves are fit to a single point. However, all libraries were screened at a higher concentration then 1.8 uM and some were screened at higher than 9 uM and therefore the false negative numbers are found to be inflated when including this curve class. Therefore, for calculation of false negatives we only report the numbers using the high confidence curve classes. Also, note for this reason the TP and FP numbers are the same using Class 1–3 curve class as the comparison set for the 1.8 uM dataset.