Table 4.
Period 1 (10/1/1999–3/31/2002) | |||||||||
Drug class | 1 episode | 2 episodes | 3 episodes | ||||||
Mean ± SD | N | (1) Mean ± SD | (2) Mean ± SD | N | (1) Mean ± SD | (2) Mean ± SD | (3) Mean ± SD | N | |
Atypical agents | 197 ± 143 | 14,352 | 68 ± 57 | 151 ± 97 | 2,505 | 50 ± 38 | 51 ± 35 | 114 ± 111 | 480 |
Typical agents | 139 ± 133 | 3,126 | 62 ± 53 | 113 ± 112 | 707 | 54 ± 38 | 42 ± 27 | 88 ± 88 | 156 |
Period 2 (10/1/2002–3/31/2005) | |||||||||
Drug class | 1 episode | 2 episodes | 3 episodes | ||||||
Mean ± SD | N | (1) Mean ± SD | (2) Mean ± SD | N | (1) Mean ± SD | (2) Mean ± SD | (3) Mean ± SD | N | |
Atypical agents | 174 ± 141 | 18,523 | 67 ± 57 | 139 ± 126 | 3,305 | 51 ± 37 | 47 ± 32 | 114 ± 107 | 712 |
Typical agents | 141 ± 130 | 2,698 | 61 ± 61 | 133 ± 127 | 546 | 57 ± 45 | 46 ± 30 | 68 ± 64 | 109 |
The conventional approach in calculating treatment persistence included the prescription episode among patients with only one prescription episode, the first prescription episode among those with two prescription episodes, and the first prescription episode among those with three prescription episodes (shaded columns).