Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 27;5(3):e1000331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000331

Table 2. Detailed comparison between automatic and expert classifications.

Reference classification Num. clust. Homogeneity Joining probability
SCOP SF 779 85.2 68.0
CATH SF 885 81.1 66.4
SCOP or CATH SF - 86.3 69.1
SCOP folds 466 92.0 44.5
CATH folds 473 91.4 10.7
SCOP or CATH folds - 95.4 45.0

First column: reference classification. Second column: Number of clusters in the reference classification. Third column: Percentage of the 779 clusters in the automatic classification that are pure with respect to the reference classification (in case of CATH or SCOP, it is the fraction of clusters that are pure with respect to either CATH or SCOP). Fourth column: Percentage of the pairs joined in the reference classification that are joined in the automatic classification. In the case of folds, only pairs in different superfamilies are counted.