Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 30;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-5

Table 10.

CASP7 results, 24 or more residue separation

template ID [0,10)% [10,20)% [20,30)% [30,40)% [40,50)% [50,60)% [60,70)% [70,80)% All
proteins 29 29 16 4 7 4 3 1 93

positive pairs 13532 8254 9720 2882 2972 2898 1046 644 41948

negative pairs 1163932 685474 887304 300968 244838 353646 47386 65662 3749210

SAM_T06 9.6% 9.7% 13.9% 10.5% 15.3% 8.5% 12.6% 3.6% 11.0%

Betapro 6.8% 7.9% 11.4% 10.8% 9.5% 6.0% 7.9% 2.9% 8.6%

ProfCon 11.1% 13.3% 17.2% 15.9% 13.9% 9.7% 10.4% 8.0% 13.2%

Possum 8.2% 9.0% 11.7% 8.7% 9.8% 3.4% 6.5% 0.5% 8.9%

SVMcon 10.4% 13.2% 12.9% 8.9% 14.4% 11.1% 11.3% 5.1% 11.8%

8AI 9.1% 10.4% 11.6% 13.3% 18.4% 15.6% 9.0% 10.4% 11.2%

8TE 8.6% 29.0% 53.1% 72.0% 80.3% 78.9% 92.5% 75.8% 37.6%

Results for the CASP7 targets: sequence separations 24 residues or more, inclusive. Comparison between our two predictors (8AI and 8TE) and the predictors ranked highest at CASP7. We report F1 for the contact class, as a function of sequence similarity to the best PSI-BLAST template. Predictions are from the CASP7 web site. ProfCon is in italics because it predicted 73 out of 93 maps, hence its results are not exactly comparable. In bold is the highest F1 of all predictors, excluding ProfCon, and excluding 8TE, which uses templates and has the highest F1 in all ranges except [0,10)% where it performs worse than some of the predictors.