Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 30;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-5

Table 9.

CASP7 results, [12, 23] residue separation

template ID [0,10)% [10,20)% [20,30)% [30,40)% [40,50)% [50,60)% [60,70)% [70,80)% All
proteins 29 29 16 4 7 4 3 1 93

positive pairs 3676 2336 3006 818 800 804 268 176 11884

negative pairs 117104 95092 84186 27010 26008 25896 7484 6148 388928

SAM_T06 13.6% 11.7% 18.1% 21.5% 16.7% 15.1% 12.7% 12.2% 14.6%

Betapro 18.5% 18.3% 24.4% 34.3% 20.4% 17.6% 25.9% 10.6% 21.4%

ProfCon 26.3% 26.3% 25.2% 29.9% 25.8% 26.0% 27.5% 28.3% 26.3%

Possum 14.8% 18.3% 24.0% 19.6% 18.1% 5.7% 15.3% 18.2% 17.8%

SVMcon 22.1% 22.3% 20.8% 21.5% 23.1% 22.0% 20.0% 40.8% 22.2%

8AI 25.9% 25.8% 25.7% 40.7% 34.8% 35.6% 31.0% 47.3% 28.5%

8TE 24.0% 40.2% 64.9% 82.8% 76.9% 91.3% 91.8% 86.5% 52.6%

Results for the CASP7 targets: sequence separations of 12 to 23 residues, inclusive. Comparison between our two predictors (8AI and 8TE) and the predictors ranked highest at CASP7. We report F1 for the contact class, as a function of sequence similarity to the best PSI-BLAST template. Predictions are from the CASP7 web site. ProfCon is in italics because it predicted 73 out of 93 maps, hence its results are not exactly comparable. In bold is the highest F1 of all predictors, excluding ProfCon, and excluding 8TE, which uses templates and has the highest F1 in all ranges except [0,10)% where it is slightly worse than only 8AI.