Table 3.
The review of the literature in male infertility
| Author | Total | Gonosomal chromosome (n/%) | Chromosomal anomalies (n/%) | In General (n/%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly | Gonosomal | Autosomal | Chromosomal anomalies | |||
| Structural | Numerical | |||||
| Mau et al. [5] | 150 | – | 6 (4.0) | 6 (4.0) | 12 (8.0) | 18 (12.0) |
| Tuerlings et al. [6] | 1792 | 6 (0.3) | 24 (1.3) | 30 (1.6) | 42 (2.3) | 72 (4.0) |
| Gunduz et al.[7] | 102 | – | 13 (12.7) | 13 (12.7) | 3 (2.9) | 16 (15.6) |
| Meschede et al.[8] | 432 | – | 2 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 7 (1.6) | 9 (2.1) |
| Peschka et al.[9] | 781 | 4 ( 0.5 ) | 7 (0.8) | 11 (1.4) | 19 (2.4) | 30 (3.8) |
| Nakamura et al.[10] | 1790 | 19 (1.0) | 80 (4.4) | 99 (5.5) | 126 (7.0) | 225 (12.6) |
| Dohle et al.[11] | 150 | 1 (0.6) | 8 (5.3) | 9 (6.0) | 7 (4.6) | 16 (10.6) |
| Morel et al.[12] | 335 | – | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.5) | – | 9 (2.6) |
| Rao et al.[13] | 251 | 2 (0.7) | 8 (3.1) | 10 (3.9) | 18 (7.1) | 28 (11.1) |
| Clementini et al.[14] | 2078 | 36 (1.7) | 6 (0.2) | 42 (2.0) | – | 42 (2.0) |
| Nagvenkar et al.[15] | 88 | 3 (3.4) | 2 (2.2) | 5 (5.6) | 5 (5.6) | 10 (11.3) |
| Samli et al.[16] | 819 | 14 (1.7) | 36 (4.3) | 50 (6.1) | 17 (2.0) | 67 (8.1) |
| Meza-Espinoza et al.[17] | 227 | 5 (2.0) | 36 (15) | 41 (18) | 2 (0.8) | 43 (18.9) |
| Lissitsina et al.[18] | 90 | – | 5.6 | 5.6 | 7.8 | 13.4 |
| Mohammed et al.[19] | 289 | 3 (1.0) | 19 (6.5) | 22 (7.8) | 1 (0.3) | 23 (8.0) |
| Total | 9374 | 93/8265 (1.12) | 249/9284 (2.68) | 342/9284 (3.68) | 259/6871 (3.77) | 608/9284 (6.54) |
| Our study | 179 | 2 (1.11) | 16 (8.93) | 18 (10.0 ) | 3 (1.68) | 21 (11.74) |