Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 4;64A(3):365–369. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gln030

Table 1.

Comparative Analysis of Giant Cell Arteritis Mortality Studies to Date

Study Year Number of Patients Percent Biopsy Proven Primary Method of Analysis Unit Time Findings
Hauser and colleagues (19) 1971 19 63 Life table y No effect
Huston and colleagues (8) 1978 42 90 Kaplan-Meier mo No effect
Jonasson and colleagues (20) 1979 136 100 Standardized mortality ratio mo No effect
Graham and colleagues (21) 1981 90 100 Life table mo Increased mortality in women
Chuang and colleagues (22) 1982 15 93 Kaplan-Meier mo No effect
Gouet and colleagues (23) 1985 87 100 Life table y No effect
Andersson and colleagues (24) 1986 90 72 Standardized mortality ratio mo Increased 5-y survival, no  effect at 10 and 15 y
Nordborg and Bengtsson (18) 1989 284 100 Standardized mortality ratio mo No effect
Bisgård and colleagues (25) 1991 34 100 Standardized mortality ratio y Increased mortality
Nesher and colleagues (26) 1994 43 91 Standardized mortality ratio mo Increased mortality
Matteson and colleagues (27) 1996 205 Not reported (<100) Standardized mortality ratio d No effect
García-Porrúa and colleagues (28) 1996 54 100 Standardized mortality ratio mo Increased mortality at 5 y, no  effect at 10 y
González-Gay and colleagues (29) 1997 109 100 Standardized mortality ratio mo No effect
Gran and colleagues (30) 2001 42 100 Cox proportional hazard mo No effect
Uddhammar and colleagues (31) 2002 136 100 Standardized mortality ratio d Increased mortality in women
Salvarani and colleagues (32) 2004 173 87 Kaplan-Meier d No effect
Crow and colleagues 2007 44 100 Kaplan-Meier d Increased mortality at 5 y

Note: d = days; mo = months; y = years.