Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: Chest. 2008 Jan 15;133(3):640–645. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2488

Table 2.

Performance Characteristics of the Method in Establishing or Excluding a Diagnosis of PH Defined as MPAP From RHC > 25 mm Hg

Criterion Sensitivity (95% CI), %* Specificity (95% CI), %* PPV (95% CI), %* NPV (95% CI), %*
Formula-predicted MPAP > 19 mm Hg 100 (66–100) 25 (13–41) 39 (13–41) 100 (66–100)
Formula-predicted MPAP > 21 mm Hg
  Validation 95 (74–99) 58 (41–73) 51 (35–70) 96 (78–100)
  Derivation, % 100 40 50 100
Formula-predicted MPAP > 25 mm Hg
  Validation 63 (38–84) 85 (70–94) 67 (36–86) 83 (63–89)
  Derivation, % 71 81 71 81
Formula-predicted MPAP > 35 mm Hg 21 (6–46) 100 (91–100) 100 (22–99) 73 (60–82)
*

PH was considered to be present when MPAP by RHC was > 25 mm Hg.

For comparison purposes, the performance of the predictor in the original derivation cohort is also listed.4