Table 2.
Performance Characteristics of the Method in Establishing or Excluding a Diagnosis of PH Defined as MPAP From RHC > 25 mm Hg
Criterion | Sensitivity (95% CI), %* | Specificity (95% CI), %* | PPV (95% CI), %* | NPV (95% CI), %* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Formula-predicted MPAP > 19 mm Hg | 100 (66–100) | 25 (13–41) | 39 (13–41) | 100 (66–100) |
Formula-predicted MPAP > 21 mm Hg | ||||
Validation | 95 (74–99) | 58 (41–73) | 51 (35–70) | 96 (78–100) |
Derivation, %† | 100 | 40 | 50 | 100 |
Formula-predicted MPAP > 25 mm Hg | ||||
Validation | 63 (38–84) | 85 (70–94) | 67 (36–86) | 83 (63–89) |
Derivation, %† | 71 | 81 | 71 | 81 |
Formula-predicted MPAP > 35 mm Hg | 21 (6–46) | 100 (91–100) | 100 (22–99) | 73 (60–82) |
PH was considered to be present when MPAP by RHC was > 25 mm Hg.
For comparison purposes, the performance of the predictor in the original derivation cohort is also listed.4