Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug;39(4):354–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01729.x

Table 6.

Summary of the two-trait analyses with a pleiotropic QTL model affecting both CM and SCS vs. the two-linked QTL model, each affecting one trait.

Pleiotropic QTL
Two-linked QTL
LA
LDLA
LA
LDLA
Breed QTL position (cM) LRT QTL position (cM) LRT11 CM QTL (cM) SCS QTL (cM) LRT11 SCS QTL when CM QTL fixed at 74.1 cM LRT22
DR 3.7 8.1 69.1 10.6 95.1 3.7 7.2 Did not converge
FA 34.7 4.6 48.7 6.5 71.7 37.5 5.5 72.2 0.15
SRB 73.1 12.4 77.2 11.6 70.4 73.5 10.2 74.1 4.37
DR + FA + SRB 72.2 14.1 74.4 19.7** 79.7 95.1 14.1 74.1 5.1

LRT, likelihood ratio test.

1

Likelihoods were compared with a hypothesis of no QTL.

2

Likelihoods were compared with the clinical mastitis QTL fixed at 74.1 cM, and the search for SCS QTL was restricted to between 59 and 80 cM on BTA9.

**

P<0.01.