Table 1.
Comparison of proportions of motoneurones with EPSPs and IPSPs evoked from the ipsilateral and contralateral NR
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathways | Test | Total no | Ipsi NR | Contra NR |
| Ipsilaterally descending | EPSPs | 38 | 37% | 53% |
| Contralaterally descending | EPSPs | 37 | 38% | 19% |
| Ipsilaterally descending | IPSPs | 38 | 29% | 42% |
| Contralaterally descending | IPSPs | 37 | 0% | 0% |
Columns: 1, pathways via which facilitation was evoked; 2, tested PSPs; 3, total numbers of motoneurones tested; 4 and 5, percentages of motoneurones in which PSPs were evoked by stimulation (trains of 4–5 stimuli, at 100 μA) of the ipsilateral (4) or the contralateral (5) NR. Ipsilateral and contralateral denote nuclei and tracts with respect to motoneurones. No significant differences were found between percentages of motoneurones affected by stimulation of ipsilateral and contralateral NR via either pathway (Chi-square tests).