Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 20;586(Pt 24):5865–5884. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.163998

Table 1.

Comparison of proportions of motoneurones with EPSPs and IPSPs evoked from the ipsilateral and contralateral NR

1 2 3 4 5
Pathways Test Total no Ipsi NR Contra NR
Ipsilaterally descending EPSPs 38 37% 53%
Contralaterally descending EPSPs 37 38% 19%
Ipsilaterally descending IPSPs 38 29% 42%
Contralaterally descending IPSPs 37 0% 0%

Columns: 1, pathways via which facilitation was evoked; 2, tested PSPs; 3, total numbers of motoneurones tested; 4 and 5, percentages of motoneurones in which PSPs were evoked by stimulation (trains of 4–5 stimuli, at 100 μA) of the ipsilateral (4) or the contralateral (5) NR. Ipsilateral and contralateral denote nuclei and tracts with respect to motoneurones. No significant differences were found between percentages of motoneurones affected by stimulation of ipsilateral and contralateral NR via either pathway (Chi-square tests).