Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2009 Feb 23;119(9):1253–1262. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.798983

Table 1.

Evaluation of cardiac function

Groups LVED (mm) LVES (mm) AW (mm) PW (mm) HR (bpm) E-TIME (ms) FS (%)
NTG (n=8) 3.69±0.1 2.35±0.1 0.75±0.05 0.78±0.04 551±13 45±1.8 36.3±2
β-TG (n=7) 3.62±0.1 2.34±0.1 0.79±0.04 0.80±0.03 594±16 43±2.5 35.7±2
cMyBP-CWT:(t/t)/β (n=6) 3.75±0.1 2.39±0.1 0.79±0.04 0.82±0.03 579±19 45±2.0 36.3±1
cMyBP-CAllP+:(t/t)/β (n=7) 3.52±0.1 2.26±0.1 0.78±0.04 0.77±0.02 585±19 44±1,0 35.8±1

Hearts were visualized with a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA, USA) Sonos 5500 instrument and a 15 MHz transducer as described.1 Measurements were averaged from ≥ three separate cardiac cycles: left ventricular (LV) end diastolic thickness (LVED), LV end systolic thickness (LVES), anterior wall thickness (AW), posterior wall thickness (PW), aortic ejection time (E-TIME in milliseconds), fractional shortening (FS) and heart rate (HR). Data are expressed as mean±SE. No significant differences were observed. mm; millimeter, bpm; beats per minute, ms; milliseconds.