Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 27;2(2):97–103. doi: 10.1007/s11832-008-0078-0

Table 2.

Patients according to number, surgery, time of consolidation (days), complications, procedure, shortening, follow-up (months), RATLIFF’s functional evaluation, Rfunctional evaluation. VO valgus osteotomy, PL plate, LLC long leg cast

Number Surgery Time of consolidation (days) Complications Procedure Shortening (cm) Follow-up (months) RATLIFF’s functional evaluation
1 VO + PL 95° + bone graft + LLC + 2 screws 48 Epiphysiodesis Expectant 3 71 Fair
2 VO + PL 120° + LLC 68 0 57 Fair
3 VO + Pl 120° 60 Necrosis type 2 + epiphysiodesis Expectant 4 28 Poor
4 07/94: VO + PL 120° 09/94: Bone graft + LLC 240 Delayed Posterior bone graft 1 24 Good
5 VO + DCP + LLC Plate + screws 70 Epiphysiodesis Expectant 1 44 Fair
6 VO + PL 120° + LLC 45 0 38 Good
7 05/95: VO + 06/95: DCP + + bone graft + LLC + Plate + screws 56 Epiphysiodesis 2 36 Fair
8 VO + PL 120° + LLC 45 0 29 Good
9 VO + PL 120° 58 Epiphysiodesis Expectant 3 23 Fair