Table 6.
Comparison of number of positive responsesa between CC + PMV and CCb
| If the victim is | CC + PMV | CC | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A family member | 202 (99.5%) | 202 (99.5%) | 1.0 |
| A close friend | 202 (99.5%) | 201 (99.0%) | > 0.95 |
| A stranger of different gender | 189 (93.1%) | 193 (95.1%) | 0.424 |
| A stranger of different race | 187 (92.1%) | 192 (94.6%) | 0.359 |
| A stranger of different gender and race | 177 (87.2%) | 192 (94.6%) | 0.004 |
| A stranger sustaining facial trauma | 141 (69.5%) | 181 (89.2%) | < 0.001 |
| A stranger who is a child | 195 (96.1%) | 196 (96.6%) | > 0.95 |
| A stranger who is elderly | 183 (90.1%) | 190 (93.6%) | 0.143 |
| An unkempt stranger | 103 (50.7%) | 162 (79.8%) | < 0.001 |
| A person with whom you have a personal dispute | 167 (82.3%) | 187 (92.1%) | < 0.001 |
aPositive responses are recoded from the variables “definitely yes” and “probably yes”
bThe McNemar test was used for the analysis of these two dependent categorical variables
CC + PMV chest compressions and mouth-to-mouth ventilation, CC chest compressions only