Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 8;9(4):179–185. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0024-4

Table 2.

Correlations between the UCLA parameters and scores before and after arthroscopy and ESWT

UCLA score
Pain Function ROM mean (±SD) Strength Satisfaction Total
Group I arthroscopy (22 cases)
 Before treatment 1.7 (1.1) 3.1 (2.4) 2.0 (1.5) 2.4 (1.2) 0 9.3 (5.2)
 After treatment 8.1 (2.7) 8.5 (2.6) 4.5 (0.8) 4.6 (0.7) 4.3 (1.7) 30.3 (7.6)
 P-valuea <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Group II ESWT
 Before treatment 2.4 (1.7) 4.1 (2.9) 2.5 (1.4) 3.2 (1.3) 0 12.3 (6.5)
 After treatment 7.3 (2.8) 8.4 (2.6) 4.3 (1.2) 4.5 (0.9) 3.5 (2.3) 28.1 (9.3)
 P-valuea <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
P-valueb (group I vs. II)
 Before treatment 0.10 0.21 0.24 0.03 0.09
 After treatment 0.33 0.89 0.51 0.67 0.19 0.38

aP-value, paired Student’s t-test

bP-value, analysis of variance