Table 2.
Correlations between the UCLA parameters and scores before and after arthroscopy and ESWT
UCLA score | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pain | Function | ROM mean (±SD) | Strength | Satisfaction | Total | |
Group I arthroscopy (22 cases) | ||||||
Before treatment | 1.7 (1.1) | 3.1 (2.4) | 2.0 (1.5) | 2.4 (1.2) | 0 | 9.3 (5.2) |
After treatment | 8.1 (2.7) | 8.5 (2.6) | 4.5 (0.8) | 4.6 (0.7) | 4.3 (1.7) | 30.3 (7.6) |
P-valuea | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Group II ESWT | ||||||
Before treatment | 2.4 (1.7) | 4.1 (2.9) | 2.5 (1.4) | 3.2 (1.3) | 0 | 12.3 (6.5) |
After treatment | 7.3 (2.8) | 8.4 (2.6) | 4.3 (1.2) | 4.5 (0.9) | 3.5 (2.3) | 28.1 (9.3) |
P-valuea | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
P-valueb (group I vs. II) | ||||||
Before treatment | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.03 | – | 0.09 |
After treatment | 0.33 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.19 | 0.38 |
aP-value, paired Student’s t-test
bP-value, analysis of variance