Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 8;9(4):179–185. doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0024-4

Table 3.

Correlation between the outcomes obtained according to the UCLA system and the radiological changes after arthroscopy and ESWT

No. of cases (%)
Excellent/good Poor
Group I arthroscopy (22 cases)
 Complete resorption 15 (68.18)
 Partial resorption 3 (13.63) 1 (4.54)
 No change 3 (13.63)
 P-valuea before and after the treatment = 0.001
Group II ESWT (24 cases)
 Complete resorption 12 (50.0)
 Partial resorption 2 (8.33)
 No change 3 (12.5) 7 (29.16)
 P-valuea before and after the treatment = 0.001
P-valueb (group I vs. II) 0.955 0.79

aP-value, paired Student’s t-test

bP-value, analysis of variance