Table 3.

Experimentally derived EPR parameters for {Cu^II(PrP(106–114))}, Cu(M109I), and Cu(M112I), [(L^SEP)Cu^II(H₂O)(OClO₃)]⁺, [(pbnap)Cu-OMe]⁺ and the computationally determined EPR parameters for [(L^SEP)Cu^II(H₂O)(OClO₃)]⁺, [(pbnap)Cu-OMe]⁺, [Cu^II(KH)O]⁺, [Cu^II(KH)N]⁺, and [Cu^II(GKH)]⁺.

	g_∥	g_⊥	A_∥(MHz)
{Cu^II(PrP(106–114))}	2.223	2.028	459^a
Cu(M109I)	2.221	2.014	462^a
Cu(M112I)	2.223	2.029	456^a
[(L^SEP)Cu^II(H₂O)(OClO₃)]⁺
experimental^b	2.23	2.03	476^a
calculated^c	2.188	2.055	−503
[(pbnap)Cu-OMe]⁺
experimental^d	2.244	2.060	460^a
calculated^c	2.183	2.055	−486
[Cu^II(KH)O]⁺	2.185	2.046	−491
[Cu^II(KH)N]⁺	2.114	2.034	307
[Cu^II(GKH)]⁺	2.1s31	2.038	−449

^a)

The sign of the hyperfine coupling constant was not determined.

^b)

The EPR data is taken from reference 57.

^c)

This study.

^d)

The EPR data is taken from reference 58.