Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2008 Sep 13;157(2):319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.014

Table 2.

Zero-Order Correlations Between Fitness, Behavior, and Dependent Measures for Each Instruction Condition.

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. VO2max
2. Sex −.76
3. Age .13 −.15
4. IQ (K-BIT) .20 −.05 −.09
5. BMI −.09 −.11 .16 −.17
6. Accy. ERN −.17 −.03 −.04 −.11 .13
7. Spd. ERN .13 −.25 .05 −.08 .04 .75
8. Accy. P-E PC .22 −.07 .10 .08 .12 −.32 −.30
9. Spd. P-E PC −.11 .12 .20 −.04 .08 −.03 −.21 .42
10. Accy. P-E RT −.21 .36 .10 .03 .03 .08 .03 −.01 .23
11. Spd. P-E RT −.24 .41 −.06 .04 −.03 .02 −.10 −.02 .15 .62

Note. VO2max = maximal oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min); Sex, 0 = male, 1 = female; Accy. = accuracy instruction; Spd. = speed instruction; ERN = error-related negativity; P-E = post-error; PC = percentage correct (response accuracy); RT = response time.

All correlation coefficients ≥ .246 were significant at p ≤ .05.