Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):270–273. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.270

Table 3.

Impact of nets on prevalence of any parasitaemia (logistic regression analysis: final model also included stunting, no access to covered wells, and sex)

Variable No (%) of children with parasitaemia Geometric mean for parasite density Adjusted odd ratio (95% CI) χ2 test (P value)*
No net 132/189 (70) 4404 Reference group
Untreated net 115/233 (49) 2890 0.49 (0.24 to 1.00)
Treated net 120/326 (37) 2745 0.38 (0.23 to 0.62)  8.75 (0.013)
Use of net in past month 107/315 (34) 3291 0.53 (0.35 to 0.79)  6.69 (0.010)
Ethnic group:
 Ndamba  49/136 (36) 3901 Reference group
 Pogoro  76/114 (67) 3423 3.78 (1.62 to 8.87)
 Hehe  42/97 (43) 4315 1.53 (0.74 to 3.16)
 Other 209/409 (51) 3070 2.48 (1.27 to 4.84) 14.63 (0.002)
Age (months):
 0-6   17/61 (28) 2040 Reference group
 7-12 106/245 (43) 2710 3.00 (0.95 to 9.44)
 13-18 114/204 (56) 4111  3.64 (1.31 to 10.14)
 >18 140/248 (56) 3622  4.85 (1.57 to 14.96)  13.4 (0.004)
Religion:
 Other than Muslim or Catholic  52/127 (41) 4434 Reference group
 Muslim 157/267 (59) 2967 2.40 (1.32 to 4.35)
 Catholic 159/351 (45) 3404 1.54 (1.00 to 2.37)  8.85 (0.012)

CI=confidence interval. *Likelihood ratio test.