Table 5 Outcome: patient improvement.
| Intervention ED n = 114 (%) | Intervention WIC n = 221 (%) | Intervention combined ED and WIC n = 335 (%) | Control ED n = 358 (%) | p Value* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How much has this problem improved, if at all? | n = 114 | |||||
| Very much better | 45 (37.5) | 90 (43.6) | 135 (39.5) | 142 (39.6) | 0.99 | |
| Much better | 36 (31.6) | 91 (39.0) | 127 (34.1) | 138 (38.2) | ||
| No change | 18 (18.0) | 28 (12.1) | 46 (16.0) | 48 (13.5) | ||
| Much worse | 3 (3.0) | 3 (1.0) | 6 (2.4) | 8 (2.4) | ||
| Very much worse | 2 (1.6) | 3 (1.3) | 5 (1.5) | 9 (2.6) | ||
| Not applicable | 10 (8.3) | 6 (3.0) | 16 (6.5) | 13 (3.7) | ||
*Comparison between intervention combined and control sites, using appropriate regression models, allowing for clustering and sampling probability. Percentages in table also take account of probability of being sampled.