Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 20;100(3):487–493. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604885

Table 1. Comparison of clinicopathological findings between FISH negative and positive gastric carcinomas.

  ERBB2 amplification
 
  Negative (n=218) Positive (n=38) P value
Age (years) 66 (±10.8) 63 (±13.6) NS
      NS
Sex      
 Male 127 (58.3%) 18 (47.4%)  
 Female 91 (41.7%) 20 (52.6%)  
       
Histopathological classification(s)
 Lauren     0.007
  Intestinal 121 (55.5%) 31 (81.6%)  
  Diffuse 63 (28.9%) 3 (7.9%)  
  Non classified 34 (15.6%) 4 (10.5%)  
 Carneiro     0.013
  Glandular 119 (54.5%) 31 (81.6%)  
  Isolated cells 62 (28.4%) 3 (7.9%)  
  Solid 5 (2.3%) 2 (5.3%)  
  Mixed 28 (12.8%) 2 (5.3%)  
  Non classified 4 (1.8%)    
 Ming     0.021
  Expansive 56 (26%) 18 (47.4%)  
  Infiltrative 153 (71.2%) 20 (52.6%)  
  Mixed 6 (2.8%)  
       
Venous invasion     NS
 Positive 147 (68%) 24 (63.2%)  
 Negative 69 (32%) 14 (36.8%)  
       
Nodal metastases a     NS
 N0 73 (34%) 9 (23.7%)  
 N+ 142 (66%) 29 (76.3%)  
       
Clinical stage a     NS
 0–IA 26 (12.1%) 2 (5.3%)  
 IB 21 (9.8%) 3 (7.9%)  
 II 41 (19%) 7 (18.4%)  
 IIIA 50 (23.3%) 10 (26.3%)  
 IIIB 35 (16.3%) 7 (18.4%)  
 IV 42 (19.5%) 9 (23.7%)  
       
Type of surgery a     NS
 Curative 141 (72.3%) 23 (67.6%)  
 Palliative 54 (27.7%) 11 (32.4%)  

NS=non significant.

a

Missing cases due to lack of clinical information.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure