Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Dec;46(14):3210–3224. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.024

Table 2.

Strategy for analyzing the fMRI results comparing consistency effects, orthographic consistency (OrthCon) and phonological consistency (PhonCon), for Normal and Impaired Readers

Contrast Figures/tables
Analysis 1: Effect of overall consistency for Normal Readers Average of 2 model coefficients > 0 Table 3; Fig. 2
Analyses 2 and 3: Effect of each consistency type for Normal Readers OrthCon > 0, PhonCon > 0 Table 3
Analysis 4: Effect of overall consistency for Impaired Readers Average of 2 model coefficients > 0 Table 3
Analyses 5 and 6: Effect of each consistency type for Impaired Readers OrthCon > 0, PhonCon > 0 Table 3
Analysis 7: Group differences in overall consistency Normal > Impaired for average of 2 model coefficients, Normal > Impaired for OrthCon Table 4; Fig. 2
Analyses 8 and 9: Group differences for each consistency type Normal > Impaired for PhonCon Table 4; Fig. 2
Analysis 10: Brain-behavior correlations within each group 2nd level regression: PA(Normal) + PA(Impaired) for OrthCon and PhonCon separately Figs. 3 and 4