Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr 16;48(6):671–680. doi: 10.1177/0091270008317305

Table I.

Evaluation of Single Midazolam Samples for Predicting Midazolam AUC Prior to the Administration of a CYP3A-Inducing Agent (Phase 1)

Time, h r2 Median Prediction Error (Residual)a (90% CI) Mean Squared Prediction Errorb (90% CI) MRT Phase 1c (90% CI)
.5 0.889 -5.75 (-20, 20) 1874 (993-2756)
1 0.938 1.67 (-15, 15) 1044.75 (380-1710)
1.5 0.966 -2.11 (-11, 11) 575 (108-1042)
2 0.918 0.52 (-17, 17) 1381 (382-2380)
2.5 0.956 0.75 (-12, 12) 740 (116-1364)
3 0.948 2.11 (-14, 14) 560 (207-912)
3.5 0.978 -0.43 (-9, 9) 36 (153-579)
4 0.984 -1.22 (-7, 7) 244 (61-428)
5 0.976 0.38 (-9, 9) 395 (136-655)
6 0.978 1.46 (-9, 9) 368 (103-635)
8 0.983 -3.59 (-8, 8) 278 (87-468)
24 0.903 -4.02 (-19, 19) 1644 (904-2383)
3.47 h (3.11-3.82)
Optimal sampling time, h 4 5 3.5 3.5

CI, confidence interval; MRT, mean residence time.

a

Median prediction error: median value of the sum of individual prediction errors (AUCpred - AUC0-∞).

b

Mean squared prediction error: mean value of the sum of individual squared prediction errors.

c

Mean residence time: average of individual subjects' MRTs obtained prior to Ginkgo biloba extract administration.