Table.
Micromechanical Characteristics of Murine Enamel from 4 Compositional Groups* Used in the Study (Values represent x̄ ± SD) and Their Statistical Comparison (t test, α = 0.05)
p values | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wet Untreated | Dry Untreated | Dry Treated | Wet Treated | Wet Untreated vs. Wet Treated |
Dry Untreated vs. Dry Treated |
Wet Untreated vs. Dry Untreated |
Wet Treated vs. Dry Treated |
||
Hardness (HV0.981) | Mid-saggital plane | 301 ± 8 | 345 ± 4 | 364 ± 8 | 369 ± 12 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.09 |
Transverse plane | 319 ± 5 | 325 ± 11 | 336 ± 5 | 341 ± 11 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |
Fracture toughness (MPa*m1/2) |
Mid-saggital plane | 1.57 ± 0.1 | 1.22 ± 0.1 | 1.01 ± 0.1 | 0.91 ± 0.13 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.04 |
Transverse plane | 0.57 ± 0.1 | 0.52 ± 0.1 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.13 | 0.23 | |
Crack length (μm) | Mid-saggital plane | 13.8 ± 0.9 | 15.7 ± 0.9 | 17.4 ± 1.1 | 18.7 ± 1.9 | ||||
Transverse plane | 27.1 ± 3.5 | 28.8 ± 4.4 | 38.4 ± 5.5 | 40.2 ± 5.1 |
Three samples per group were tested; from 10 to 14 micro-indentations in the mid-sagittal plane and from 5 to 9 in the transverse plane were performed on each sample.