Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 20;322(7279):134–137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7279.134

Table 2.

 Results at end point (end of three consecutive cycles) in 170 women with the premenstrual syndrome (active treatment n=86; placebo n=84)

Mean value
Difference in mean reduction (active minus placebo) (95% CI) P value*
Active (n=86) Placebo (n=84)
Primary efficacy variable:
 Differences in self assessment −128.5 −78.1  −50.5 (−23.5 to −77.5) 0.001
Secondary efficacy variables :

 Irritability (self assessment) −28.9 −18.2 −10.7 (−3.4 to −18.0) 0.001
 Mood alteration (self assessment) −28.7 −17.6 −11.1 (−4.4 to −17.8) 0.001
 Anger (self assessment) −22.1 −11.7 −10.3 (−3.1 to −17.5) 0.001
 Headache (self assessment) −17.8  −5.9 −11.9 (−4.3 to −19.6) 0.002
 Others and bloating (self assessment) −12.4 −13.7 1.3 (−5.5 to 8.1) NS
 Breast fullness (self assessment) −18.6  −9.4  −9.2 (−2.8 to −15.6) 0.001
 Severity of condition (CGI item 1)  −1.5  −1.0  −0.5 (− 0.1 to −0.8) 0.001
 Improvement/deterioration (CGI item 2)   2.9   3.9  −1.0 (−0.7 to −1.3) 0.001
 Overall assessment risk or benefit (CGI item 3)   2.9   2.2 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0) 0.001
 Responder rate (%)§ 52 24

CGI=clinical global impression. 

*

Mann-Whitney rank sum test. 

Visual analogue scale combined for six items. 

Difference in means with 95% CI. 

§

Response ⩾50% improvement in combined visual analogue scale from baseline to end point.