Table 3 Post‐treatment isokinetic concentric (Conc) and eccentric (Ecc) peak torques (in N.m) in both groups of patients: comparative study between treated and non‐involved sides (asymmetry in %).

	Control group (n = 46)			Eccentric group (n = 46)
	Treated	Non‐involved	Asymmetry	Treated	Non‐involved	Asymmetry
Wrist extensors
Conc 30°/s	7.2±3.4	10.8±2.5	−33±19%*	10.9±2.8	10.6±2.4	+ 3±14%
Conc 90°/s	6.6±2.6	9.2±2.2	−28±17%*	9.2±2.5	9.1±2.2	+ 1±15%
Ecc 60°/s	9.7±3.8	15.6±3.2	−38±19%*	17.4±3.4	15.8±3.3	+ 10±15%*
Forearm supinators
Conc 30°/s	5.3±2.9	7.3±2.3	−27±17%*	7.5±2.8	7.1±2.1	+ 6±15%
Conc 90°/s	4.8±2.4	6.9±2.1	−30±18%*	7±2.2	6.8±2.0	+ 3±14%
Ecc 60°/s	7.1±3.3	11.4±2.7	−38±19%*	13.3±3.1	11.2±2.5	+ 16±16%*

*represents a significant (p<0.05) difference between the treated and non‐involved sides in each group of patients.