Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 15;83(3):206–210. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.023309

Table 2 Diagnostic and performance measures of the speculum examination in the three patient groups.

SYM (n = 12 073) CON (n = 1676) ASYM (n = 2169)
Speculum examination, relevant lesion, % (n) 11.8 (1425) 4.6 (77) 3.9 (85)
 Syphilis 5.9 (713) 1.7 (29) 0.6 (14)
 Herpes 4.2 (513) 0.6 (11) 1.7 (37)
 Referral 1.6 (199) 2.2 (37) 1.6 (34)
Performance*
 Sensitivity (%, 95% CI) 10.8 (9.6 to 12.1) 30.2 (25.2 to 35.5) 2.2 (0.8 to 4.7)
 Specificity (%, 95% CI) 95.3 (94.9 to 95.7) 75 (72.6 to 77.3) 99.3 (98.8 to 99.6)
 PPV (95% CI) 40 (36.3 to 43.8) 22.5 (18.6 to 26.7) 30 (11.9 to 54.3)
 NPV (95% CI) 78.7 (77.9 to 79.5) 81.7 (79.4 to 83.8) 87.6 (86.2 to 89)
 LR+ (95% CI) 2.3 (2 to 2.7) 1.21 (1 to 1.5) 3 (1.16 to 7.71)
 LR– (95% CI) 0.9 (0.9 to 1) 0.9 (0.9 to 1) 1 (0.9 to 1)
Bimanual examination, any sign, % (n) 8 (966) 2.2 (34) 1.2 (26)
 PID 5.4 (657) 0.6 (10) 0.3 (7)
 Referral 1.1 (129) 0.2 (4) 0.3 (6)

ASYM, asymptomatic patients not known to be contacts of partners with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) presenting to clinic for a check‐up; CON, asymptomatic patients who are known contacts of partners with an STI; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; PPV, positive predictive value; SYM, symptomatic group.

*Likelihood that a cervicovaginal lesion found on speculum examination would lead to a clinical diagnosis of herpes or syphilis, or a referral for further clinical evaluation.