Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.050

Table VII.

Associations of surgeon characteristics and informed consent opinionsa

Private vs academic practiceb Odds ratio (95% CI) Caseload >50% vs50% EVARc Odds ratio (95% CI) Age50 vs > 50d Odds ratio (95% CI)
Odds of including complication
Myocardial infarction after EVAR 1.7 (0.7-3.7) 0.6 (0.3-1.3) 3.7 (1.8-7.7)e
Myocardial infarction after open repair 3.5 (1.5-8.1)e 1.0 (0.4-2.1) 3.7 (1.7-8.3)e
Renal failure after EVAR 3.6 (1.6-7.9)e 0.4 (0.2-0.9)e 1.0 (0.5-2.0)
Renal failure after open repair 3.3 (1.5-7.5)e 0.3 (0.2-0.7)e 1.1 (0.5-2.3)
Prolonged ventilation after open repair 5.5 (2.1-14.3)e 0.4 (0.2-0.9)e 2.0 (0-9-4.2)
Permanent disability after open repair 2.2 (0.8-6.0) 1.5 (0.6-3.7) 2.6 (1.1-6.3)e
Odds of quoting higher complication rates
Mortality after open repair 1.8 (0.8-3.9) 3.1 (1.4-6.4)e 0.8 (0.4-1.5)
Reintervention rates after EVAR 1.4 (0.6-3.0) 0.3 (0.1-0.7)e 1.8 (0.9-3.6)

EVAR, Endovascular repair.

a

This table includes outcome variables with at least one significant association. Odds ratios are adjusted for practice setting, age, and most frequently performed surgery.

b

Odds ratio > 1 indicates greater tendency for private practice surgeons to discuss or quote a higher rate for given complication compared with academic surgeons.

c

Odds ratio > 1 indicates greater tendency for surgeons who perform majority EVAR to discuss or quote a higher rate for given complication compared with surgeons who perform majority open AAA repair.

d

Odds ratio > 1 indicates greater tendency for younger surgeons to discuss a given complication compared with older surgeons.

e

Statistically significant at P < .05.