Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct 24;99(1):49–59. doi: 10.1152/jn.00211.2007

TABLE 1.

Passive and active electrical properties of LS and TL bladder neurons from CYP-treated and control rats

Property Treatment LS TL
A. Current injection
RMP, mV Control −55.02 ± 2.1 −47.78 ± 1.0*
CYP −55.34 ± 1.6 −49.61 ± 1.3
Spontaneous activity Control 0/23 (0%) 0/23 (0%)
CYP 11/31 (35%) 13/29 (45%)
Rheobase, pA Control 146.1 ± 14.5 95.7 ± 7.5*
CYP 66.2 ± 6.2 50.6 ± 5.5
Rheobase, pA/pF Control 5.67 ± 0.7 2.54 ± 0.2*
CYP 2.28 ± 0.3 1.14 ± 0.2
AP threshold, mV Control −24.5 ± 1.4 −23.3 ± 0.7
CYP −30.1 ± 0.8 −28.2 ± 1.0
AP amplitude, mV Control 87.9 ± 4.1 87.4 ± 2.1
CYP 93.4 ± 2.2 89.9 ± 3.0
AP duration, ms Control 3.1 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.2
CYP 4.2 ± 0.3 5.0 ± 0.6
Rheobase × 2 (APs) Control 5.0 ± 0.9 6.3 ± 0.6
CYP 10.7 ± 2.1 9.2 ± 0.7
B. ATP (100 μM)
Depolarization, mV Control 24.5 ± 1.5 6.2 ± 1.2*
CYP 31.9 ± 1.5 14.1 ± 1.2
Number of APs Control 8.9 ± 0.7 3.7 ± 1.4*
CYP 15.2 ± 2.1 13.5 ± 3.6
C. αβ-metATP (100 μM)
Depolarization, mV Control 15.3 ± 1.4 5.4 ± 1.1*
CYP 25.6 ± 1.3 13.2 ± 1.2
Number of APs Control 5.2 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 1.3*
CYP 12.9 ± 0.9 10.3 ± 1.4

Values are means ± SE, or percentages.

*

P < 0.05 versus LS counterparts

P < 0.05 versus control (saline) treatment.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure