Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Oct 1;34(12):1677–1686. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323933

TABLE 1.

Means and Standard Deviations (in parentheses) of Perceptions of Judges, Emotions, Appraisals, and Creativity by Feedback Condition

Feedback Condition
Social Evaluation
Nonsocial
Rejection Approval Control
“[Judges] thought I
performed well”1
3.1 (1.3)a 5.1 (1.3)b
Negative emotions2, 3 −1.1 (1.1)a −1.6 (1.1)b −1.4 (1.1)b
Resource appraisals 3.7 (0.8)a 4.3 (0.8)b 3.9 (0.9)a
Creativity 9.4 (1.8)a 7.7 (1.6)b 8.4 (2.0)b

NOTE: Different subscript letters across rows indicate significant differences by condition.

1

We averaged ratings made for the male and female judges.

2

Emotion ratings were created by subtracting positive emotions from negative emotions, such that higher numbers indicate more negative emotions.

3

Means are adjusted for pretask emotion ratings.