Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 19;102(4):251–259. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp006

Table 4.

Comparison of prediction of outcome by three methods in 385 patients with paraquat concentrations more than 4-h post ingestion

Method Specificity (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio Positive predictive value (95% CI) Negative predictive value (95% CI)

Proudfoot/ Scherrmann 0.83 (0.76–0.86) 0.81 (0.76–0.86) 4.82 0.22 0.87 (0.82–0.91) 0.76 (0.69–0.82)
Sawada et al. 0.93 (0.87–0.96) 0.58 (0.51–0.64) 7.70 0.46 0.92 (0.86–0.96) 0.61 (0.54–0.67)
Jones et al. 0.92 (0.87–0.96) 0.66 (0.60–0.72) 8.15 0.37 0.92 (0.87–0.96) 0.66 (0.59–0.72)