Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):865–872. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.029

Table 2.

Results From the ANCOVA Models.

Source F df P Effect Size
Aged Corrected model 4.012 4 .018
Intercept 7.174 1 .016
Age (y) 0.870 1 .364
Pace 9.424 1 .007 1.21
Protocol 1.676 1 .213 0.18
Distance 4.472 1 .050 0.51
Error 17
Total 22
Neuro Corrected model 4.883 4 .004
Intercept 22.467 1 .000
Age (y) 3.204 1 .084
Pace 7.682 1 .010 1.21
Protocol 0.233 1 .633 0.34
Distance 0.494 1 .488 0.40
Error 29
Total 34

NOTE. The dependent variable was the mean velocity (weighted by 1/SE from each group). Age was entered as a covariate in both models. Effect sizes were calculated for the single degree of freedom (df) comparisons (d-index) by using unadjusted values.