Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 28;276(1657):699–706. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1324

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of the time frame for reciprocating grooming on the symmetry in grooming reciprocation. The relationship between grooming given and received was significant in the three analyses (within bouts: b±CI=0.63±0.08, t400=18.26, p<0.0001; within days: b±CI=0.61±0.08, t343=15.46, p<0.0001, dyadic long term: b±CI=0.83±0.08, t151=16.16, p<0.0001). The overlap of confidence intervals (CI) between the within-bouts and within-days analyses indicates that the differences in the symmetry in grooming reciprocation were not significant. The lack of overlap of CI between the dyadic long-term and other two analyses indicates that these differences were significant. (*** indicates p<0.0001.)