Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 4;8:359. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-359

Table 3.

Comparative analysis between genotype frequencies and the risk of lung cancer in the subgroups of females

Female Genotype Cases
(n = 104)
Controls
(n = 105)
OR (95% CI) p-value asOR (95% CI)a p-value
-3444 C>T CC 35 39 1 1
CT 50 58 0.96 (0.53 – 1.74) 0.89 0.94 (0.51 – 1.72) 0.85
TT 19 8 2.65 (1.03 – 6.80) 0.04 2.23 (0.85 – 5.84) 0.10
CT+TT 69 66 1.17 (0.66 – 2.06) 0.60 1.11 (0.62 – 1.98) 0.73

CC+CT 85 97 1 1
TT 19 8 2.71 (1.13 – 6.51) 0.03 2.31 (0.95 – 5.64) 0.07

-1985 G>T GG 36 39 1 1
GT 49 57 0.93 (0.52 – 1.68) 0.81 0.93 (0.51 – 1.70) 0.81
TT 19 9 2.29 (0.92 – 5.70) 0.08 1.93 (0.76 – 4.91) 0.17
GT+TT 68 66 1.12 (0.63 – 1.97) 0.70 1.07 (0.60 – 1.92) 0.81

GG+GT 85 96 1 1
TT 19 9 2.38 (1.02 – 5.55) 0.04 2.02 (0.85 – 4.78) 0.11

P1170A C>G CC 37 37 1 1
CG 49 58 0.85 (0.47 – 1.53) 0.58 0.84 (0.46 – 1.55) 0.59
GG 18 10 1.80 (0.73 – 4.42) 0.20 1.57 (0.63 – 3.91) 0.34
CG+GG 67 68 0.99 (0.56 – 1.74) 0.96 0.96 (0.53 – 1.72) 0.88

CC+CG 86 95 1 1
GG 18 10 1.99 (0.87 – 4.54) 0.10 1.73 (0.75 – 4.02) 0.20

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aasOR are adjusted for age.