Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 4;8:359. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-359

Table 5.

Comparative analysis between genotype frequencies and the risk of lung cancer in the subgroups of non-drinkers

Non-drinker Genotype Cases (n = 118) Controls (n = 78) OR (95% CI) p-value asOR (95% CI)b p-value
-3444 C>T CC 38 23 1 1
CT 51 47 0.66 (0.34 – 1.26) 0.21 0.69 (0.35 – 1.35) 0.28
TT 29 8 2.19 (0.86 – 5.61) 0.10 2.85 (1.06 – 7.69) 0.04
CT+TT 80 55 0.88 (0.47 – 1.64) 0.69 0.96 (0.51 – 1.82) 0.90

CC+CT 89 70 1 1
TT 29 8 2.85 (1.23 – 6.62) 0.01 3.60 (1.47 – 8.84) 0.01

-1985 G>T GG 39 23 1 1
GT 50 47 0.63 (0.33 – 1.20) 0.16 0.67 (0.34 – 1.31) 0.24
TT 29 8 2.14 (0.84 – 5.46) 0.11 2.81 (1.04 – 7.56) 0.04
GT+TT 79 55 0.85 (0.46 – 1.57) 0.60 0.94 (0.50 – 1.78) 0.85

GG+GT 89 70 1 1
TT 29 8 2.85 (1.23 – 6.62) 0.01 3.60 (1.47 – 8.84) 0.01

P1170A C>G CC 40 22 1 1
CG 50 48 0.57 (0.30 – 1.10) 0.10 0.61 (0.31 – 1.21) 0.16
GG 28 8 1.93 (0.75 – 4.94) 0.17 2.64 (0.97 – 7.18) 0.06
CG+GG 78 56 0.77 (0.41 – 1.43) 0.40 0.86 (0.45 – 1.63) 0.64

CC+CG 90 70 1 1
GG 28 8 2.72 (1.17 – 6.34) 0.02 3.59 (1.46 – 8.88) 0.01

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

basOR are adjusted for age and gender.