Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2008 Jul;22(4):469–484. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.469

Table 7.

Baseline McNemar Results: Specificity and Sensitivity Using Conventional and Robust Norms for Diagnostically NL Groups

Sensitivity
Specificity
NL→DEC
HT NL→DEC Early Late
Working Memory
 Conventional 91% 8% 7% 9%
 Robust 91% 18% 22% 14%
Immediate Memory
 Conventional 94% 17% 22%* 12%
 Robust 94% 13% 24%* 2%
Delayed Memory
 Conventional 93% 10% 15% 5%
 Robust 93% 20%*+ 32%*+ 9%
Attention-Language
 Conventional 94% 7% 7% 7%
 Robust 94% 18%*+ 17% 19%

Note. HT = healthy test group; NL→DEC = normal decline group; early = normal baseline evaluation with early decline to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease (less than 5 years after baseline); late = normal baseline evaluation with late decline to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease (5 years or more after baseline).

+

Significantly different from Sensitivity using Conventional norms within group, p < .05.

*

Significantly higher proportion impaired than HT group, p < .01.