Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug;22(8):681–685. doi: 10.1155/2008/702516

TABLE 1.

Clinical and laboratory variables for 11 patients who underwent endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD)

Case number Age (years) Sex CRP (mg/dL) WBC (/μL) Period to ETGBD (days)* Fever (days) Abdominal pain (days) Hospitalization (days) Remarks
ETGBD successful
  1 57 Female 0.2 8800 1.0 2.0 1.0 20.0
  2 89 Male 0.2 8000 2.0 1.0 0.0 9.0
  3 57 Female 2.3 6100 5.0 3.0 3.0 14.0
  4 62 Male 3.1 13,300 0.0 1.0 1.0 8.0
  5 60 Male 0.3 12,300 2.0 0.0 1.0 7.0
  6 89 Male 0.2 8000 0.0 2.0 1.0 29.0
  7 74 Female 31.7 9300 4.0 7.0 2.0 15.0 Gallbladder cancer
  Mean 69.7 5.4 9400 2.0 2.3 1.3 14.6
ETGB unsuccessful
  8 60 Male 20.6 9700 3.0
  9 62 Male 0.2 4200 0.0
  10 69 Male 8.6 20,100 0.0
  11 77 Male 14.2 9800 4.0 Cystic duct perforation
  Mean 67 10.9 10,950 1.8

In ETGBD-unsuccessful patients, period to ETGBD, fever, abdominal pain and hospitalization were not applicable because ETGBD was not successful (and percutaneus transhepatic gallbladder drainage was performed).

*

Period to ETGBD is the period from admission to performance of ETGBD;

Fever was the duration of fever;

Abdominal pain was the duration of abdominal pain. CRP C-reactive protein on admission; WBC White blood cell count on admission