Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 24;100(6):959–970. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604924

Table 1. Relationship between cell-cycle phenotype and clinicopathological parameters.

  I (out-of-cycle) II (in-cycle G1-delayed/arrested) III (actively cycling)
  Mcm2 <30% Mcm2 ⩾30% Mcm2 ⩾30%
    Geminin <7% Geminin ⩾7%
  N=33 (18%) N=44 (24%) N=105 (58%)
Age, mean (s.d.) (P=0.13) 61.9 (12.4) 61.2 (14.1) 57.4 (13.9)
       
Grade (P<0.001)*
 1 27% (9/33) 23% (10/44) 5% (5/105)
 2 61% (20/33) 64% (28/44) 30% (32/105)
 3 12% (4/33) 14% (6/44) 65% (68/105)
       
Size, mean (s.d.) (P=0.55) 24.7 (17.5) 29.1 (19.8) 28.0 (17.4)
       
Positive nodes (P=0.23) 39% (12/31) 33% (13/40) 48% (47/98)
       
NPI, mean (s.d.) (P<0.001) 3.8 (1.3) 4.0 (1.2) 4.9 (1.2)
       
ER+ casesa (P=0.08) 100% (73.9–100%) 100% (100–100%) 88.9% (0–100%)
PR+ casesa (P=0.14) 72.4% (35.8–100%) 92.2% (47–100%) 18.8% (0–97.8%)
       
Her-2
 0 66.7% (22/33) 68.2% (30/44) 53.3% (56/105)
 1+ 15.2% (5/33) 18% (8/44) 19% (20/105)
 2+ 9.1% (3/33) 4.5% (2/44) 7.6% (8/105)
 3+ (P=0.45) 9.1% (3/33) 9.1% (4/44) 20% (21/105)

ER=oestrogen receptor; NPI=Nottingham Prognostic Index; PR=progesterone receptor.

aMedian (interquartile ranges).

*Significant association restricted to phenotype III.