Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2008 Oct 18;22(16):2179–2185. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328312c756

Table 1.

Relative risk of heterosexual transmission of HIV between serodiscordant couples per 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 log10 increment of plasma HIV RNA concentration.

Risk ratio per log10 Δ HIV RNA
Reference No. of discordant couples No. of events Viral assay 0.3 0.5 1.0
Quinn et al. [23]a 415 90 RT-PCR 1.31 (1.20, 1.42) 1.56 (1.36, 1.80) 2.45 (1.85, 3.26)
Fideli et al. [24]b 1022
 Female-to-Male 43 RT-PCR 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 1.6 (1.2, 2.0) 2.5 (1.5, 4.0)
 Male-to-Female 66 RT-PCR 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 1.3 (1.1, 1.7) 1.8 (1.2, 2.8)
Hisada et al. [25]a 299 9 bDNA 1.14 (0.97, 1.36) 1.19 (0.98, 1.20) 1.31 (0.94, 1.84)
Tovanabutra et al. [26]c 493 218 RT-PCR 1.19 (1.09, 1.31) 1.34 (1.15, 1.57) 1.81 (1.33, 2.48)

Weighted mean 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) 2.0 (1.4, 2.8)

bDNA, branched DNA signal-amplification assay (Chiron, Emeryville, CA, U.S.A.); RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HIV monitor test, Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ, U.S.A.).

a

History of heterosexual couple contacts based on self-report.

b

Viruses sequenced to exclude non-transmitting couples from analysis.

c

Cross-sectional study that did not measure incident infections nor exclude individuals with other HIV infection risk factors for transmission.