Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 16;117(3):367–372. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11608

Table 5.

Change in outcome, expressed in percentage of outcome SD (and corresponding 95% confidence intervals) associated with 1 SD increase in exposure.a

Exposure indicator
Outcome Blood Hg Nail Hg Hair Hg (7 years ago) Latent Hg
Latent HRV 24.9 (−0.67 to 50.6)* 11.1 (−19.6 to 42.0) −0.20 (−24.3 to 39.0) 7.80 (−31.7 to 47.3)
 CVRR% 43.3 (20.3 to 66.3)** 25.5 (−0.60 to 51.5)* 25.9 (−1.39 to 53.1)* 5.80 (−29.1 to 40.5)
 C-CVLF 59.2 (31.2 to 87.3)** 42.7 (11.4 to 74.0)** 39.8 (6.26 to 73.5)** 24.1 (−20.0 to 68.2)
 C-CVHF 37.2 (10.7 to 63.9)** 27.6 (−0.29 to 55.5)* 17.2 (−13.1 to 47.5) 9.40 (−22.8 to 41.5)
Latent CVF 23.9 (−12.1 to 60.1) 37.1 (0.46 to 74.3)** 14.5 (−29.3 to 58.0) 38.0 (−5.60 to 81.2)*
 Systolic BP 37.5 (5.12 to 69.9)** 23.3 (−10.4 to 56.1) 22.1 (−13.7 to 58.3) 33.8 (−7.16 to 74.6)
 Diastolic BP 33.2 (3.15 to 62.9)** 30.9 (0.72 to 61.5)** 14.1 (−18.9 to 46.6) 32.4 (−2.58 to 67.2)*
 Heart rate 8.90 (−23.7 to 41.2) 13.3 (−19.4 to 45.7) 17.6 (−16.9 to 52.6) 24.0 (−6.76 to 54.1)
Latent BAEP −5.9 (−33.9 to 22.1) 13.5 (−18.0 to 45.0) 9.50 (−20.1 to 38.0) 2.4 (−25.2 to 28.8)
 III 20 Hz 9.80 (−20.6 to 40.2) 8.20 (−22.8 to 38.2) 26.5 (−5.30 to 58.3) 4.50 (−27.9 to 36.0)
 V 20 Hz 17.5 (−11.1 to 46.1) 19.3 (−8.88 to 47.4) 30.3 (23.0 to 59.6)** 11.3 (−21.2 to 43.8)
 III 40 Hz −7.10 (−36.4 to 23.1) −9.50 (−39.0 to 20.9) 7.70 (−25.2 to 40.6) −11.6 (−44.5 to 21.3)
 V 40 Hz 15.3 (−13.6 to 45.9) 12.3 (−15.4 to 41.6) 32.5 (5.25 to 58.8)** 4.2 (−28.0 to 36.4)
Latent IMTb
 Mean 25.0 (−5.27 to 55.3) 41.9 (14.2 to 69.6)** 33.6 (3.64 to 63.3)** 29.0 (−3.94 to 61.9)*
 Maximum 16.8 (−16.0 to 49.7) 34.8 (3.99 to 65.6)** 34.3 (2.50 to 66.0)** 24.7 (−10.5 to 59.8)
 Minimum 23.0 (−6.77 to 52.8) 39.0 (11.7 to 66.6)** 29.4 (−0.29 to 59.0)* 24.6 (−7.71 to 56.9)
a

All results in the first row of each latent outcome and in the last column of latent Hg exposure were from SEM analyses. All other results were from multiple regression analysis where an individual outcome is regressed on an exposure indicator. Models were adjusted for age, smoking, alcohol consumption, fish dinners, and BMI.

b

SEM results not available because of high correlations among the three similar IMT measures.

*

p < 0.10;

**

p < 0.05.