Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 5;283(49):34403–34413. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804053200

TABLE 3.

Catalytic activity of CjMan26C mutants

CjMan26C varianta kcat/Kmb Activity relative to CjMan26Cc Activity relative to CjMan26A
min−1M−1
Wild type CjMan26C 3.0 × 109 ± 3.3 × 108 1.0 2.1 × 102
Wild type CjMan26A 1.4 × 107 ± 2.8 × 105 4.6 × 10−3 1.0
E221A 7.5 × 102 ± 2.6 × 101 2.5 × 10−7 5.4 × 10−4
E338A 7.7 × 102 ± 1.3 × 101 2.6 × 10−7 5.5 × 10−4
L129G 4.0 × 106 ± 3.8 × 105 1.3 × 10−3 0.29
L129A 7.4 × 106 ± 1.5 × 105 2.5 × 10−3 0.53
D130Gd 2.7 × 105 ± 7.5 × 104 9.0 × 10−5 1.9 × 10−2
D130Ad 2.9 × 104 ± 3.1 × 103 9.7 × 10−6 2.1 × 10−3
L129G/D130G 8.2 × 107 ± 9.1 × 106 2.4 × 10−2 5.9
L129A/D130Ad 4.5 × 104 ± 4.5 × 103 1.5 × 10−5 3.2 × 10−3
ΔL129/D130d 2.7 × 105 ± 1.6 × 104 9.0 × 10−5 1.9 × 10−2
ΔN128/L129/D130d 2.7 × 104 ± 1.7 × 103 9.0 × 10−6 1.9 × 10−3
ΔN128/L129/D130/A131d 3.4 × 104 ± 6.6 × 102 1.1 × 10−5 2.4 × 10−3
a

The varants are all of CjMan26C.

b

The substrate used to measure catalytic efficiency was mannotetraose.

c

The activity is expressed as decrease in activity relative to wild type CjMan26C. For example, wild type CjMan26A is 210-fold less active than wild type CjMan26C.

d

Variants that display endo-activity (see Table 4).