Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 8;4(4):e5138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005138

Table 3. Difference in parasitological outcomes between the arms- unadjusted and adjusted for age, gestation, initial parasitaemia and haemogobin.

Unadjusted odds ratios (95%CI) Sig p Adjusted odds ratios (95%CI) Sig p Unadjusted relative risk ((95%CI))
AQ+SP v AQ+AS 0.13 (0.02–1.1) 0.06 0.13 (0.015–1.1) 0.06 0.15 (0.02–1.2)
AQ+SP v SP1 0.08 (0.005–0.7) 0.025 0.06 (0.006–0.6) 0.02 0.09 (0.01–0.76)
AQ+SP v CD2 0.046 (0.006–0.36) 0.003 0.046 (0.005–0.36) 0.004 0.06 (0.008–0.43)
AQ+AS v SP 0.56 (0.15–2.1) 0.4 0.61 (0.16–2.4) 0.47 0.61 (0.19–1.9)
AQ+AS v CD3 0.34 (0.13–0.86) 0.02 0.36 (0.14–0.94) 0.04 0.40 (0.18–0.90)
SP v CD 0.60 (0.18–2.0) 0.4 0.57 (0.16–2.0) 0.4 0.66 (0.2–1.8)

Best arm first in each pairwise comparison, without PCR adjustment.

1

AQ+SP significantly better than SP.

2

AQ+SP significantly better than CD.

3

AQ+AS significantly better than CD.