Table 15.10.

Comparison of performance of AutoDecon and Pulse2 algorithms evaluated from simulated data based on Pulse2 with basal secretion results

	Median	Mean ± SEM	Interquartile range
AutoDecon (P value = 0.01)a
%true positive	100.00	98.91 ± 0.12	0.00
%false positive	0.00	1.09 ± 0.12	0.00
%false negative	0.00	0.28 ± 0.15	0.00
%sensitivity	100.00	99.44 ± 0.16	0.00
AutoDecon (P value = 0.02)a
%true positive	100.00	98.06 ± 0.17	0.00
%false positive	0.00	1.94 ± 0.17	0.00
%false negative	0.00	0.28 ± 0.15	0.00
%sensitivity	100.00	99.44 ± 0.16	0.00
AutoDecon (P value = 0.0325)a
%true positive	100.00	96.98 ± 0.20	6.67
%false positive	0.00	3.02 ± 0.20	6.67
%false negative	0.00	0.24 ± 0.15	0.00
%sensitivity	100.00	99.47 ± 0.16	0.00
Pulse2 with basal secretiona
%true positive	100.00	97.50 ± 0.21	5.56
%false positive	0.00	2.50 ± 0.21	5.56
%false negative	0.00	5.64 ± 0.35	8.71
%sensitivity	94.44	94.08 ± 0.35	9.09

^aPeak alignments within 10 min.