Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 23;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-23

Table 2.

N1-P2 complex amplitude mean values and corresponding IHAD (± SEM) over temporal lobes (electrodes T5 and T6) for each stimulation (the number of subjects within each group is in brackets).

NH-l RD-l NH-r LD-r ANOVA
1 kHz tone burst
 Ipsilateral 2.724 ± 0.513 3.318 ± 0.434 3.931 ± 1.155 4.337 ± 0.776 F(3.26) = 1.077, p = 0.376
(7) (10) (5) (8)
 Contralateral 3.486 ± 0.519 3.973 ± 0.483 4.830 ± 1.212 4.165 ± 0.668 F(3,25) = 0.535, p = 0.663
(7) (10) (4) (8)
 IHAD 16.7 ± 7.05 9.20 ± 2.77 0.851 ± 8.39 1.06 ± 6.57 F(3.25) = 1.563, p = 0.223
(7) (10) (4) (8)

Unvoiced CV syllable/pa/
 Ipsilateral 2.533 ± 0.401 3.114 ± 0.479 2.783 ± 0.807 3.229 ± 0.501 F(3.25) = 0.354, p = 0.786
(7) (10) (5) (7)
 Contralateral 3.097 ± 0.512 3.225 ± 0.416 3.363 ± 1.135 2.666 ± 0.722 F(3.25) = 0.204, p = 0.893
(7) (10) (5) (7)
 IHAD 9.90 ± 3.49 3.95 ± 2.77 5.51 ± 4.45 -15.5 ± 8.24 F(3.25) = 4.956, p = 0.008* *
(7) (10) (5) (7)